home contents changes options help subscribe edit (external edit)

Ok, let's start at the discussion. First thoughts and just brainstorming

Tom

Firstly what are we going to orginize? We've the following:

  • The O'Reilly Zope Book
  • The Zope Developers Guide
  • Document Template Markup Language Reference
  • Zope Administrator's Guide
  • Zope Content Manager's Guide
  • Zope Developer's Guide
  • Z SQL Methods User's Guide
  • Zope Quick Reference
  • How-To's
  • Tips
  • Chats
  • Up-to-date? Source Documentation (http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Developer/ZopeSrcDocs)
  • We should also put in links to the beehive docs (and any other 3rd party docs) where appropriate - mindlace

Added 03/10/2000 Rik Hoekstra

  • Wikis
  • Miscellaneous bits of documentation on the ZDP site and in member pages. There is also the FAQ and the Snippets on ZDP
  • Interface documents
  • Zope Help system (do we need to address this, how?)

New?

These are the following tasks we're facing at?

  • Provide a user friendly and fast (ie easy to find information) documentation web page

    mindlace 04/10 This is the top priority, yes.

  • Provide a way to store all this information, so that lookup and search is easy and direct?

    mindlace 04/10 I'm not sure what this means, but we're not making any tools this time around.

    tom 05/10 is te same as point 1.

  • Provide a way to allow an easy way to add comments to the documentation?

    *Rik Hoekstra 03/10: Nah, no public comments please

    mindlace 04/10 We'll do this systematically in the next version of zope.org. Not in the works now.

    tom 05/10 I think some comments can be helpfull for improving the documentation. (If good tools are available, cfr. my post on ZWiki? Wiki)

  • Provide a way to easy add documents in the documentation-portal. So that the doc finds automatically its place.

  • Provide means to present the documentation (over all categories the same interface) : printer, download, ...

    mindlace 04/10 not a bad idea

  • ...

How to get started?

  • We've to put the documentation into groups which will be handled the same. eg. A guide and a book can be placed in the

same category. But a FAQ or How-To is different as a guide or a book.

  • Paul suggests role oriented grouping. What I think is that we have topic oriented grouping, and then role oriented grouping. I don't think that content-type grouping is very meaningful. I never think "I'm looking for a Tip/Guide/HowTo?" I think "How do I solve this problem" mindlace 04/10

tom 05/10 Yes, better idea, but it would also be nice to have every document fixed to a certain categorie. Every categorie has straight guidelines to follow. Depending on which guidelines you follow will eventually typecast your document to a certain category.

So which groups to we have?

  • Guides and books
  • How-To's, Tips and FAQ
  • Code Snippets (?) added 03/10 by Rik
  • mindlace would say "developer, buisness, site builder*. Then we make the developer stuff link straight from dev, and the other stuff will link to

their respective areas when they get developed.

Tom 05/10 Mmm, problem sometimes is that people don't know in which group they belong (like me), or to which place the information will be meaningfull. What is the difference in a Zope developer and Zope Site Builder? Some Products need to be developed for making a site and thus a site builder will work on a product. What with information which overlaps some of the groups?

  • Parallel to this organization, there's also topics, like server, dtml, etc. I was hoping that Tim Cook's categorization of the how-tos would help here. EG:

    • deploying Zope & Apache
    • A comparison of Zope and other app servers
    • Using Zope & Pike in Roxen

    These three things are all "server" documentation, but they're for each audience.


dev/currentprojects dev/proposed projects dev/zopecore dev/projects dev/projects/ptk

build/api build/products build/products/ptk



subject:
  ( 1 subscriber )